1371988
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd October, 2009
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
16119814
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd November, 2008
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
222101618
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 16th December, 2008
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
2601732
Published: 25th September, 2008
Last edited: 26th September, 2008
Created: 24th September, 2008
This just emerged from the depths. Although launched from Sweden, it works in most European countries. At least those with a coast. Or a rather deep river. Periskåp means what it sounds like.
330261
Published: 30th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd October, 2008
Created: 23rd September, 2008
This font is an attempt to create something that harks back to the 1950's and/or 1920's. I love the differing x heights, the mono weight, and the tall/skinny fromat.
12368411
Published: 4th November, 2008
Last edited: 30th June, 2023
Created: 4th November, 2008
The 'why not' version...with a guentersen style heart at the dagger.
3522740122
Published: 12th November, 2008
Last edited: 3rd August, 2014
Created: 14th October, 2008
I've added a side shadow to Prometheus Regular. The inspiration was a typeface from the French type foundry Peignot. Identified as "No. 1229" in their Lettres Fantaises of 1896, it sports a very fine side shadow, which I've attempted to re-create here. (I found the "No. 1229" sample on Hoefler & Frere-Jones' blog - fifth image from the top.)This is a clone
4121032
Published: 27th December, 2008
Last edited: 15th June, 2010
Created: 16th December, 2008
A condensed version of NCD Black Square II.This is a clone of NCD Black Square II
18711980
Published: 22nd January, 2009
Last edited: 11th February, 2009
Created: 8th January, 2009
TU DotMatrix Bold CondensedThis is a clone of TU DotMatrix Condensed
9601980
Published: 22nd January, 2009
Last edited: 2nd July, 2009
Created: 8th January, 2009
TU DotMatrix Medium CondensedThis is a clone of TU DotMatrix Bold Condensed
3031171
Published: 7th February, 2009
Last edited: 22nd April, 2009
Created: 30th January, 2009
For now this is unfinished font. Plan is to complete entire latin alphabet. I am sharing this incomplete font so I could receive feedback and tips how to redesign some characters.This is a clone
760213944
Published: 26th April, 2009
Last edited: 22nd June, 2009
Created: 25th February, 2009
The illegitimate child of Times New Roman and Helvetica Neue Condensed. Some alternates on the lowercase. Alternate ! is on 1 and ? is on /
Also available in the following flavors: Bold | Round
7513914
Published: 29th April, 2009
Last edited: 19th June, 2009
Created: 28th April, 2009
Bold weight of Times Neue Roman. Some alternates on the lowercase. Alternate ! is on 1 and ? is on /
1301340
Published: 12th May, 2009
Last edited: 2nd July, 2009
Created: 19th February, 2009
My primary original typeface. Intended use as a condensed highly legible type. English Complete, will be expanded further to include all other languages. Please make suggestions/come back for updates.
2041631
Published: 3rd June, 2009
Last edited: 30th June, 2009
Created: 29th May, 2009
I was in need of a free headline font for a comic story. So I build this one, quick and dirty.