My improved take on the font that is extracted from the shanzai knockoff of the Nokia 107.
Copyright disclaimer:
Any fonts that are created / published on FontStruct are the copyrighted work of the respective creator.
Buyer Beware:
The term shanzhai refers to imitation or counterfeit products that mimic the appearance of established brands, often smartphones manufactured under generic name companies (e.g. Alps) with generic name brands (Fuffi, Maimeite, Sansung, Susan, Welcome, etc.) that look nearly identical to legitimate models from companies like Apple, Samsung, Huawei, Oppo, Xiaomi, etc). These devices are typically sold at attractively low prices, but behind their polished facades, there lies serious risks in them.
A key form of deception in shanzhai smartphones involves spoofed hardware specifications. These devices may falsely claim impressive specs (e.g. "12 GB RAM + 1 TB storage") when in reality, they only contain a lot less RAM and lot less storage than what was “advertised”.
Such falsifications are achieved through firmware tampering, where system files are modified so the phone's "About Device" screen and certain foolable diagnostic apps display fake numbers.
This deliberate manipulation leads users to believe they are purchasing a high-performance phone capable of what you would deem it as "real modern multitasking and gaming", when in reality, they really cannot even do basic operations, they do overheat, and run out of storage (and battery, since they use KEBE-branded (typicall capacity is at 2,100 mAh) batteries) almost immediately.
Oh, and combined with outdated Android versions—often disguised as newer releases via modified files (e.g. build.prop)—through hidden pre-installed apps (like SwitchApp), these shanzhai devices pose serious risks to both user experience and data security.
Also, certain shanzhai smartphones falsely claim to support modern mobile technologies such as 4G LTE, Voice Over LTE (VoLTE), or even 5G, when in reality, they only function on 2G or 3G networks.
From ads that show that these shanzhai smartphones can really connect to 5G networks, to firmware modifications, these tactics are often used to display misleading information, giving users the illusion of full compatibility with what you think are the "current standards" (some even show "4G” or "5G" icons in the status bar, despite the hardware being incapable of connecting to those networks). The implications are very severe.
As mobile carriers around the world phase out 3G networks, these shanzhai smartphones will lose the ability to make calls (including emergency calls), send text messages, or use mobile data—leaving users with only Wi-Fi connectivity. This not only renders the phone nearly useless but also poses a safety risk in situations where cellular access is critical. However, things are about to change after the sunset of 2G and 3G services, these shanzai smartphones now support at least 4G networking just because they upgraded the CPU to a Unisoc (formerly Spreadtrum) SC9863A / T606 (the new kings of the fake phone world. Yes, they are legitimate 4G chips, but they perform like entry-level tech from several years ago) or a better version of MediaTek (MT6737 / MT6739, but still old-ass CPUs with 4G networking that are now pennies on the dollar for mass production), but they're still impacted as these do fallback to 3G for calls and text, meaning that they essentially did nothing to improve it.
Australia, may have (to the officials) made the right move to sunset 3G networking, but this comes at the cost of axing 4G & 5G phones that used 3G for calls (esp. emergency calls) off the network.
Beyond that, shanzhai smartphones often contain low-quality components, unstable firmware, and even pre-installed malware or data-harvesting software. Buyers may experience app incompatibility, unreliable updates, and privacy breaches without realising the root cause.
Consumers should be wary of deals from unverified online sellers on e-commerce websites (like Lazada, Shopee, etc.) advertising those shanzai smartphones that appear "too good to be true". Always verify the device's certification, check the Android API level and security patch level, and confirm the authenticity of the brand and model through official sources (e.g. iTest).
Remember that a small saving upfront could cost far more in lost data, compromised privacy, and security risks in the long run. If it appears too good to be true, it probably is.
This is a clone of 山寨起源版Yet another painstaking extraction of a font from an imitation-based knockoff of the Nokia 107.
Released, as is, with no updates whatsoever.
Supported Languages (Shown):
English (Latin)
Español (Latin)
Française (Latin)
Português (Latin)
Bahasa Melayu/Indonesia (Latin)
Tiếng Việt (Latin, although as basic as is)
Russian (Cyrillic)
Supported Languages (Not shown):
Chinese (CMYK)
Arabic/Persian (Arabic)
Hindi (Hindi)
Please don't ask for more character glyphs as I have since disposed that imitation phone off for recycling.
────────────────────────────────
A caution on shanzhai phones & and shanzhai smartphones:
The term shanzhai refers to imitation or counterfeit products that mimic the appearance of established brands, often smartphones manufactured under generic name companies (e.g. Alps) with generic name brands (Fuffi, Maimeite, Sansung, Susan, Welcome, etc.) that look nearly identical to legitimate models from companies like Apple, Samsung, Huawei, Oppo, Xiaomi, etc). These devices are typically sold at attractively low prices, but behind their polished facades, there lies serious risks in them.
A key form of deception in shanzhai smartphones involves spoofed hardware specifications. These devices may falsely claim impressive specs (e.g. "12 GB RAM + 1 TB storage") when in reality, they only contain a lot less RAM and lot less storage than what was “advertised”.
Such falsifications are achieved through firmware tampering, where system files are modified so the phone's "About Device" screen and certain foolable diagnostic apps display fake numbers.
This deliberate manipulation leads users to believe they are purchasing a high-performance phone capable of what you would deem it as "real modern multitasking and gaming", when in reality, they really cannot even do basic operations, they do overheat, and run out of storage (and battery, since they use KEBE-branded (typicall capacity is at 2,100 mAh) batteries) almost immediately.
Oh, and combined with outdated Android versions—often disguised as newer releases via modified files (e.g. build.prop)—through hidden pre-installed apps (like SwitchApp), these shanzhai devices pose serious risks to both user experience and data security.
Also, certain shanzhai smartphones falsely claim to support modern mobile technologies such as 4G LTE, Voice Over LTE (VoLTE), or even 5G, when in reality, they only function on 2G or 3G networks.
From ads that show that these shanzhai smartphones can really connect to 5G networks, to firmware modifications, these tactics are often used to display misleading information, giving users the illusion of full compatibility with what you think are the "current standards" (some even show "4G” or "5G" icons in the status bar, despite the hardware being incapable of connecting to those networks). The implications are very severe.
As mobile carriers around the world phase out 3G networks, these shanzhai smartphones will lose the ability to make calls (including emergency calls), send text messages, or use mobile data—leaving users with only Wi-Fi connectivity. This not only renders the phone nearly useless but also poses a safety risk in situations where cellular access is critical. However, things are about to change after the sunset of 2G and 3G services, these shanzai smartphones now support at least 4G networking.
Australia, may have (to the officials) made the right move to sunset 3G networking, but this comes at the cost of axing 4G & 5G phones that used 3G for calls (esp. emergency calls) off the network.
Beyond that, shanzhai smartphones often contain low-quality components, unstable firmware, and even pre-installed malware or data-harvesting software. Buyers may experience app incompatibility, unreliable updates, and privacy breaches without realising the root cause.
Consumers should be wary of deals from unverified online sellers on ecommerce websites (like Lazada, Shopee, etc.) advertising those shanzai smartphones that appear "too good to be true". Always verify the device's certification, check the Android API level and security patch level, and confirm the authenticity of the brand and model through official sources (e.g. iTest).
Remember:
A small saving upfront could cost far more in lost data, compromised privacy, and security risks in the long run. If it appears too good to be true, it probably is.
────────────────────────────────
Keypad Bitmap is both an esoteric font and an attempt to unite the world's telephone keypad layouts.
বাংলা ভাষার জন্য সমর্থন অসম্পূর্ণ কারণ আমি কীপ্যাড বিন্যাসের একটি পরিষ্কার চিত্র খুঁজে পাচ্ছি না।. আপনার কাছে উচ্চ মানের ছবি থাকলে আমাকে জানান।.
Font recreated from the Motorola WX160, and upgraded.
Note that both the Motorola WX160 and the Alcatel OT-V670 uses the same font as the display font.
Only the basic Latin glyphs are recreated as the Motorola W160 only supports:
- English
- Bahasa Melayu
- Bahasa Indonesia
This font is not a derivative of Alcatel OT-V670 created by ZEkA10000 (which is licensed under a FontStruct Non-Commercial Licence which prohibits derivatives), even if you say otherwise.
A warning to Singapore:
There could be a potentiality that this font could be "censored" by those so-called "M4N1C4LLY SE9/C00C00-B4N4N45-0F-4-51N94P0R34N", in the event that they have reported (did, could have, or in the process of getting) this font as "potential infringement of the Copyright Act of 2021".
Let me tell you something: I have my reasons for my decision, and I will stand by it, in terms of:
"Preservation of those fonts sourced from mobile phones, landline phones, household appliances (like TVs), et. al., through this font-building website FontStruct."
If there is any takedown request from anyone, even if it is from the mightiest of them all itself, the Infocomm Media Development Authority, I will rightly refuse.
They have no right to ask me to take it down just because they think that this font, at their own extremely biased view, is a "potential violation of any law(s) regarding infringement of copyright(s), patent(s), and/or trademark(s) as per regulations in Singapore (the Copyright Act of 2021) in itself".
tl/dr: "I told you already every single time, you guys don't ask that to me. Okay? Are we clear about that? I have my reasons, and I stand by it."
Because of them (whom they think that the intellectual property / copyright of this font belongs to Infocomm Media Development Authority, and the respective phone and telco companies), this font is licenced with an "All Rights Reserved" licence.
Copyright disclaimer:
Any fonts that are created / published on FontStruct are the copyrighted work of the respective creator.
Based on a Java game that I played on a Nokia phone, Diamond Rush.
Diamond Rush © 2006 Gameloft SE. All Rights Reserved.
Extended Latin (A) and Latin-1 Supplement from Czech version of game.
This font has limited Latin support.
Wow. Can’t believe that Goatmeal replied so quick with a big ‘yes’ on this one.
Tibet Rush Origin © Vienna Binders. All rights reserved.
The Cube © ITV. All rights reserved.
Copyright disclaimer:
Any fonts that are created / published on FontStruct are the copyrighted work of the respective creator.
Based on the then SGiNO's (now UMIINO's) line of discontinued keypad phones that features a 3x4 alphanumeric keypad, and an amber monochrome LCD display.
Extracted these charsets from the iNO F8. Other phones, such as the CP-09, also has the font, but lacked support for the characters in the Latin-1 Supplement group.
Fixed the "$" and added more characters to the Latin-1 Supplement group,and to the Latin Extended-A group.
A warning to Singapore:
There could be a potentiality that this font could be "censored" by those so-called "M4N1C4LLY SE9/C00C00-B4N4N45-0F-A-51N94P0R34N", in the event that they have reported (did, could have, or in the process of getting) this font as "potential infringement of the Copyright Act of 2021".
Let me tell you something: I have my decision, and I will stand by it, in terms of:
"Preservation of those display fonts sourced from any unusual keypad phones like the iNO F8, iNO CP09 through this font-building website FontStruct."
If there is any takedown request from anyone, even if it is from the mightiest of them all itself, the Housing & Development Board, I will rightly refuse.
They have no right to ask me to take it down just because they think that this font, at their own extremely biased view, is a "potential infringement of any law(s) regarding infringement of copyright(s), patent(s), and/or trademark(s) as per regulations in Singapore (the Copyright Act of 2021) in itself".
tl/dr: "I told you already every single time, you guys don't ask that to me. Okay? Are we clear about that? I have my reasons, and I stand by it."
Because of them (whom they think that the intellectual property / copyright of this font belongs to Infocomm Media Development Authority and the respective phone companies in Singapore), this font will remain as "All Rights Reserved."
Copyright disclaimer:
Any fonts that are created / published on FontStruct are the copyrighted work of the respective creator.
Based on the then SGiNO's (now UMIINO's) line of discontinued keypad phones that features a 3x4 alphanumeric keypad, and an amber monochrome LCD display.
Extracted these charsets from the iNO F8. Other phones, such as the CP-09, also has the font, but lacked support for the characters in the Latin-1 Supplement group.
Released, as is, with no changes. The following characters (in the Latin-1 Supplement) that the original font supports, is Æ, È, É, Ñ, Ö, à, æ, è, é, ñ, and ö.
A warning to Singapore:
There could be a potentiality that this font could be "censored" by those so-called "M4N1C4LLY SE9/C00C00-B4N4N45-0F-A-51N94P0R34N", in the event that they have reported (did, could have, or in the process of getting) this font as "potential infringement of the Copyright Act of 2021".
Let me tell you something: I have my decision, and I will stand by it, in terms of:
"Preservation of those display fonts sourced from any unusual keypad phones like the iNO F8, iNO CP09 through this font-building website FontStruct."
If there is any takedown request from anyone, even if it is from the mightiest of them all itself, the Housing & Development Board, I will rightly refuse.
They have no right to ask me to take it down just because they think that this font, at their own extremely biased view, is a "potential infringement of any law(s) regarding infringement of copyright(s), patent(s), and/or trademark(s) as per regulations in Singapore (the Copyright Act of 2021) in itself".
tl/dr: "I told you already every single time, you guys don't ask that to me. Okay? Are we clear about that? I have my reasons, and I stand by it."
Because of them (whom they think that the intellectual property / copyright of this font belongs to Infocomm Media Development Authority and the respective phone companies in Singapore), this font will remain as "All Rights Reserved."
Copyright disclaimer:
Any fonts that are created / published on FontStruct are the copyrighted work of the respective creator.
Based on the SMS318 MessagePhone manufactured by AstraLink and marketed under Singapore Telecommunications.
A warning to Singapore:
There could be a potentiality that this font could be "censored" by those so-called "M4N1C4LLY SE9/C00C00-B4N4N45-0F-4-51N94P0R34N", in the event that they have reported (did, could have, or in the process of getting) this font as "potential infringement of the Copyright Act of 2021".
Let me tell you something: I have my reasons for my decision, and I will stand by it, in terms of:
"Preservation of those fonts sourced from mobile phones, landline phones, household appliances (like TVs), et. al., through this font-building website FontStruct."
If there is any takedown request from anyone, even if it is from the mightiest of them all itself, the Infocomm Media Development Authority, I will rightly refuse.
They have no right to ask me to take it down just because they think that this font, at their own extremely biased view, is a "potential infringement of any law(s) regarding infringement of copyright(s), patent(s), and/or trademark(s) as per regulations in Singapore (the Copyright Act of 2021) in itself".
tl/dr: "I told you already every single time, you guys don't ask that to me. Okay? Are we clear about that? I have my reasons, and I stand by it."
Because of them (whom they think that the intellectual property / copyright of this font belongs to Infocomm Media Development Authority, and the respective phone and telco companies), this font is licenced with an "All Rights Reserved" licence.
Copyright disclaimer:
Any fonts that are created / published on FontStruct are the copyrighted work of the respective creator.