2201540
Published: 4th September, 2008
Last edited: 8th September, 2008
Created: 4th September, 2008
This is one of my narrowest fonts. All of the characters are just five bricks wide, and their corners have been cut off more severely than those of my other octagonal FontStructions.
1601540
Published: 5th September, 2008
Last edited: 12th November, 2008
Created: 5th September, 2008
Based on PortraitTextMono, but with much taller characters.This is a clone of PortraitTextMono
2601540
Published: 7th September, 2008
Last edited: 18th November, 2008
Created: 7th September, 2008
This is a rather heavy octagonal font with large and small caps. Characters are five bricks wide and have deeply cut diagonal corners.
110980
Published: 14th September, 2008
Last edited: 27th September, 2008
Created: 12th September, 2008
This is my first (Public) font. I choose a nice tall area to work with and started. Due to my schedule, this took about 5 days. Hope you like it!
1371988
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd October, 2009
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
16119814
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd November, 2008
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
222101618
Published: 16th September, 2008
Last edited: 16th December, 2008
Created: 14th September, 2008
The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph.
A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated.
2101540
Published: 17th September, 2008
Last edited: 19th September, 2008
Created: 17th September, 2008
This font consists of tall, narrow characters that are five bricks wide with rounded corners where appropriate.
236720
Published: 27th September, 2008
Last edited: 11th November, 2008
Created: 23rd September, 2008
My first Fontstruction for Typography I at DMACC in Ankeny, Iowa. My initial concept was a thin, tall, Art Deco-ish font. The Wi'gls came about when I was stumped on the "M". I think the Wi'gl adds a unique visual theme to the font. Please provide feedback - both positive and negative. Thanks!
330261
Published: 30th September, 2008
Last edited: 3rd October, 2008
Created: 23rd September, 2008
This font is an attempt to create something that harks back to the 1950's and/or 1920's. I love the differing x heights, the mono weight, and the tall/skinny fromat.
1201540
Published: 9th October, 2008
Last edited: 4th January, 2009
Created: 9th October, 2008
This font is tall and thin with characters that are five bricks wide. Like many of my other FontStructions, it is octagonal, but the mostly unfilled diagonal corners give it a rather spare look.
12368411
Published: 4th November, 2008
Last edited: 30th June, 2023
Created: 4th November, 2008
The 'why not' version...with a guentersen style heart at the dagger.
150282
Published: 4th November, 2008
Last edited: 23rd June, 2009
Created: 4th November, 2008
Ok no real description but its tall. If you were wondering why theres only the numbers 007 as I had a moment of James Bond in me.
801940
Published: 7th November, 2008
Last edited: 11th November, 2008
Created: 7th November, 2008
Been wanting to make a pixel font, here it is. The name is Factoryville - y. (Factoryville is the town I grew up in.)
Going to be more sizes & weights, and multilingual.
1301540
Published: 22nd November, 2008
Last edited: 23rd November, 2008
Created: 22nd November, 2008
A more statuesque variation of SimpleFiveMono.This is a clone of SimpleFiveMono
2601540
Published: 24th November, 2008
Last edited: 24th November, 2008
Created: 24th November, 2008
A steeper derivative of UltraBoldProportional.This is a clone of UltraBoldProportional
1701541
Published: 28th November, 2008
Last edited: 29th November, 2008
Created: 28th November, 2008
A steeper adaptation of UltraBoldMono.This is a clone of UltraBoldMono
1901540
Published: 16th December, 2008
Last edited: 16th December, 2008
Created: 16th December, 2008
A steeper variation of HeavyweightTwentyMono.This is a clone of HeavyweightTwentyMono
1301540
Published: 29th December, 2008
Last edited: 13th March, 2009
Created: 29th December, 2008
The characters of this octagonal font have been constructed with deeply cut diagonal corners, resulting in an almost chiseled look. Each symbol is five bricks wide.
901540
Published: 8th January, 2009
Last edited: 8th January, 2009
Created: 8th January, 2009
A taller, thinner variation of GrecoRomanoMono.This is a clone of GrecoRomanoMono
70541
Published: 13th January, 2009
Last edited: 13th January, 2009
Created: 13th January, 2009
This is pretty much the same typeface as the original Box Cutter design but the corners for the letters where there would be a curve is beveled to make the face a bit smoother.This is a clone of Box Cutter
1301541
Published: 14th January, 2009
Last edited: 14th January, 2009
Created: 14th January, 2009
Like YugoFiveMono, but significantly steeper.This is a clone of YugoFiveMono
1801540
Published: 23rd January, 2009
Last edited: 13th March, 2009
Created: 23rd January, 2009
A considerably taller sibling of RockSolidMono.This is a clone of RockSolidMono
2601540
Published: 24th January, 2009
Last edited: 13th March, 2009
Created: 24th January, 2009
Like RockSolidMono and RockSolidStretchMono, but even steeper.This is a clone of RockSolidStretchMono
1801540
Published: 16th February, 2009
Last edited: 13th March, 2009
Created: 14th February, 2009
A steeper variation of OctagonoMonoC.This is a clone of OctagonoMonoC