The designer of this FontStruction has chosen not to make it available for download from this website by choosing an “All Rights Reserved" license.
Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.
If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.
I've already gotten into another mess. Again a "2-in-1" font. It may work as is, but if you want to convert it to a script one you have to use some connectors between the letters, placed in the glyphs <, >, \, [, ], {, }. You must try each of them between two characters because there are many possible combinations. I add some samples down here. Don't worry and be patient, please, the result is worth it. Oh well, the actual "</>" glyphs are finally in the "©/™". To see all working, copy and paste the following sentence in the User Input window, please: Th>e q>u>i>c}k b[r{o[w[n f>o[x j{u]m]p\s o[v{e[r t]h>e l>a{zy d>o{g.
18 Comments
I've already gotten into another mess. Again a "2-in-1" font. It may work as is, but if you want to convert it to a script one you have to use some connectors between the letters, placed in the glyphs <, >, \, [, ], {, }. You must try each of them between two characters because there are many possible combinations. I add some samples down here. Don't worry and be patient, please, the result is worth it. Oh well, the actual "</>" glyphs are finally in the "©/™". To see all working, copy and paste the following sentence in the User Input window, please: Th>e q>u>i>c}k b[r{o[w[n f>o[x j{u]m]p\s o[v{e[r t]h>e l>a{zy d>o{g.
@elmoyenique - What a wonderful set of expansion characters! They really add to the versatility of this design. :^) I would venture to say that not every letter in a word needs to be "only" connected or "only" separated; combining separate and connected letters in individual words would result in innumerable unique combinations.
Dear @Goatmeal: Thanks a million once again for your continued support and encouraging comments. You're right in your tight appraisals, as usual. Not all the letters must be connected (in addition, that would require a much greater number of specific connectors), and in fact there are pairs of them that it's practically impossible to join them and they are frankly better with a small separation. This is a curious subject, and a real mess in which I have gotten myself and from which I have tried to get out as well as possible. It started with a "What if...?" and it still hasn't stopped. Thanks again for understanding, compañero.
@elmoyenique - Sometimes those "What if...?" questions make the best "messes" ! :^D
@meek: Thanks a million for this new TP, dear Boss!
That s is beautiful and the z is amazing.
@thalamic: Thank you very much, master! About s and z, glad you like it. Sometimes we must try new and a bit risky shapes.
What a great concept. I love how this gives the person working with it a lot of options.
@four: Thank you for your always kind comments. I would have liked to be able to simplify it so that it had fewer connectors (3 or 4 at most).
How did you get the curves?
Please sign in to comment.