Wow, old fashioned building bricks to make a font to build words with. Great idea well executed!! 10/10

No offence, but readability factor is at 0.

@ oddbean: I used it to embroider monograms,it worked perfectly.Didn't you try it to see?Constructive criticism is important:please re-make this font with the changes you want to see, thanks :)

Hi, ben17!

• Size: 3x6-based dot matrix characters (script ligatures excluded), though 4x6, even 5x6 eventually (as the final grid size I'd use to convert as a plain and small 1-bit font). This is a little too large for my project, because of the extra 2-dot descenders (a 5x8 font in the end, which is small but not tiny).

• Style: cool in my opinion, especially with the added dimension (cube vs squares, cf. the early voxel art nowadays).

• Readability: OddBean14Fʋck prefers large fonts with smooth outlines, I guess. It's OK, but this kind of small pixel font needs a short learning curve (mainly to untie the glyphs, which are decent individually). So, after some training, this font reads well (at distance, at least not too enlarged). The anti-scientific 'factor' that was given hastily (the personal judgment of a kid?) was referring to a scale of understanding from the viewer's standpoint (null about this design). As Aeolien suggested, the offender can try to do better (e.g. with less visible cubes on the baseline), or see again (through your half-closed eyelids)…

Really? the old bitfont maker? couldnt you use the new one?? :/

Its gallery v2 doesn't show any related font, sorry (for the quality of the samples). B.t.w. I never released any font there myself. This tool has its pros and cons. FontStruct permits more advanced/professional typefaces, I think.