The designer of this FontStruction has chosen not to make it available for download from this website by choosing an “All Rights Reserved" license.
Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.
If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.
10 Comments
(so '.' is the very small lame duck here…)
:-)
• I wonder if your effort in providing a few LC
is not counterproductive, about the legibility…
:-/
• Groszak is right when he suggests that your
3x3 font can still be greatly improved…
(I guess he sees his present as a destruction…)
^_^
• Thank you for your vision of a 3x3-grid font.
8-)
*sigh* This clone has been made by me from your version of my font. It has some minor changes, which are all the things you have mentioned that are 'wrong'. They are NOT wrong, and the cloning feature was created to let people edit fonts, if the creator had let them (I saw you complaining about no cloning on Aphoria's Uptake).
@md It's just hard to read because of Groszak's modifications. He's done something similar to my font Avant Pixel as well.
@dpla can't think of any other variations for '.' . The LC like I said is credit to Groszak.
@FontBlast: since you left-align all your 1-dot wide glyphs, why not "." itself? (many flaws as fixed width, I have to insist - and there would be even more duplicates as variable width.)
Besides:
• It's a pseudo-font (not basic Ascii)
• with duplicates (a placeholder font)
• and 5x3 matrix (not a difficult 3x3).
The only benefit of all these clones of 3x3 glyphs is to show one's preferences. Please bear in mind that only a complete 'micro' font qualifies its 'micro' glyphs (the second step/filter being the legibility). This said, the uppercase submitted here looks coherent (while its type color could be more homogeneous), and there are good 3x3 candidates all the same, so thank you for training people's eyes. :-)
Please sign in to comment.