Download disabled

Please respect their decision and desist from requesting license changes in the comments.

If you would like to use the FontStruction for a specific project, you may be able to contact the designer directly about obtaining a license.

Info:

Created on 13th April 2012. Last edited on 19th April 2012.
License:

Creative Commons
Categories:
- -
Sets:
- -
Tag:
- -
Fave Tags:
- -

10 Comments

I wish I could cheat in FS like I can in InDesign.

Comment by intaglio 17th april 2012

i dig it.

Comment by regular_one 17th april 2012

Good to have you back Intaglio. You say you're also working with another software than FS; are you publishing theses works somewhere? Maybe it should not appear clearly when seeing my work, but since my debut 2 years ago in typography, you were one of the very very few whose work "really" inspired me to the core. To be exhaustive, i could add CMunk, Nazlfrag, Neoqueto, maybe our regretted Funk King and TomoAlien for some aspects of their work and that's almost all.

Comment by Abneurone Fluid Types 17th april 2012

Welcome back, intaglio! I love this one. Not sure about z. But 25/10 nevertheless! :)

Comment by demonics 18th april 2012

How about these? I think the x may be better than your current one. Well, marginally :)

Comment by demonics 18th april 2012

Thanks, guys. neurone: For the past year or so I've been planning ideas in InDesign first. It's a quick way to chuck ideas together, using a grid and shapes that mimic the fontstruct bricks. Most of them haven't made it as far as fontstruct, because they repeat old tropes or just aren't interesting or successful.
This one isn't particularly interesting either, but I haven't done anything in fontstruct for such a long time I was pining for it.
I cheated in InDesign (not intentionally!) by using "illegal" shapes, forgetting (conveniently?) that you can't do certain things -- "squishing" combined with composites -- in a 2x2 scheme. So the Indesign plan looks nicer than the finished result in fontstruct, where I've resorted to some pretty inelegant solutions.
And speaking of solutions, thank you demonics for your very nice suggestions for the x and s. I shall incorporate those.

Comment by intaglio 18th april 2012