@Patrick H. Lauke (redux) - Very nice! Although, the number 1 is a little bland. The designers should have put in a little more effort to make it stand out!
right.
Thanks, kassymkulov.
Thanks, Frodo7
Technically, a codepage defines characters using unique numerical codes, not glyphs.
Exactly.
Calling it Codepage 437 when it is 850 is incorrect to an extent, no?
Here is my take.