@elmoyenique: Very nice. It could be a Stylistic Alternate.
Again, your version is similar to the Q of Ortica Bold. I studied a
few similar low-poly fonts
@Bryndan W. Meyerholt (BWM): Thank you. I'll probably keep both
(number 4s), one for Alternate, as you said. I have another
workshop file for discarded versions of other glyphs.
I only noticed change o 3 of them 6 and 9 which I like better more open now, on 4 I cant decide, new one fits better the set, old I like better in general.
I like the old 4 more, but for the others, the new ones are better (could have one form as an alt; the Private Use Area is a great place for that as it doesn't intefere with Unicode allocations)
I'm considering a version with cupped serifs. It would give a bit of tension to the letters.
»