An attempt at creating a set based upon each glyph being set in a square (with obvious exceptions such as i, f, 1 etc).
The 'Squarial' was the nickname for an old British motorbike - 'The Arial Square Four'
Info:
Created on 16th October 2009. Last edited on 1st April 2012.
So far this has stayed fairly faithful to the concept of creating each glyph within a square (obviously not in the case of characters such as i, l or l). However, this attempt at conformity does leave M, W, m, w looking rather narrow and results in a set that I suspect is a bit aesthetcally challenged.
Should I forsake the square and go for a more balanced look with those troublesome glyphs>
This is so classic and yet so fresh.
Beautiful work, P2pnut.
On behalf of your troublesome glyphs: I would leave the M and W as they are, but change the w and m width to match the UC´s, since you don´t really have to force them into monospace and considering other glyphs variable width like the i or f.
But you still get a tenner from me.
Which is why I feel as though I should offer my ¢0.02. While raising the power of each letter to 2 is admirable, but because you also sometimes discount it for certain glyphs, in the interest of the paying greater dividends to the shareholders, perhaps you could consider widening the M as well too. (I'll bet you couldn't guess that I just got up from doing a Finance assignment, could you? ;)
All has been said of this absolute masterpiece of yours, so clean, so elegant, so techno but with restraint... I would just have the same minuscule request I have in front of beautiful textfonts with already many many characters : Could you add the e-in-the-o and the E-in-the-O so that I could perfectly write in french ? Thanks in advance.
Hello. I used this font on a 3D model texture I made. If you would like for me to remove your font I used from my work (which I have given you full credit for), please let me know and I will do so.
http://autonomous-ink.deviantart.com/art/The-Aperture-Science-SPD-215028515
Err, gramatical error... made it sound as if it were my work that I said I have given you credit for... I'm a bit sleepy at this moment, can you tell?
You know what I meant to type. :P
@demonics: Thanks for the rating, and the suggestion. I think I will keep the R as it is - it reflects the angle of the K. My intention has been to 'keep it simple'.
27 Comments
Should I forsake the square and go for a more balanced look with those troublesome glyphs>
Beautiful work, P2pnut.
On behalf of your troublesome glyphs: I would leave the M and W as they are, but change the w and m width to match the UC´s, since you don´t really have to force them into monospace and considering other glyphs variable width like the i or f.
But you still get a tenner from me.
Which is why I feel as though I should offer my ¢0.02. While raising the power of each letter to 2 is admirable, but because you also sometimes discount it for certain glyphs, in the interest of the paying greater dividends to the shareholders, perhaps you could consider widening the M as well too. (I'll bet you couldn't guess that I just got up from doing a Finance assignment, could you? ;)
The M was one that I was uncertain about and you have helped me make my mind up. Now widened by 1/4 square (1/2 was just too much).
The m, n, p and r have had their 'tails' docked so that they match the rest ... not sure what you call these small ascenders and descenders.
http://autonomous-ink.deviantart.com/art/The-Aperture-Science-SPD-215028515
You know what I meant to type. :P
Thanks for the credit and link.
Please sign in to comment.